tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554620.post110601645230510106..comments2010-01-06T00:35:59.356-05:00Howard Lovynoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554620.post-1106082975624937632005-01-18T16:16:00.000-05:002005-01-18T16:16:00.000-05:00Howard, it surely must look like I`m jumping to conclusions here, but do you see any reason behind the "no comment" comment by Smalley? Is Smalley just keeping pace with the nano-bandwagon, in case he had to jump on it? If he´s so seriously opposed to self-replicating nanobots, why does he let the obvious misrepresentation stand as it is? <br /><br />I suspect, with such suggestive questions I´d hardly make a good journalist and it might well be against your standards to answer these questions. However, if it motivates you, just imagine I´d threaten you with 4 week old socks. Not nano-socks.<br /><br />Best regards<br />MattAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com